Competition 2014

Poets and Players Poetry Competition 2014

judged by Vona Groarke

The Winning Poems (judge’s comments below)

1st Prize: ‘Picture Window’ by Liz Venn
2nd Prize: ‘Causeway’ by Polly Atkin
3rd Prize: ‘The Workplace’ by Ken Evans

Highly Commended Poem

‘Skype’ by Stephen Sexton

Five Commended Poems

‘Another Life’ by David Underdown
‘The Name Experiment’ by Olivia Walwyn
‘Clocks’ by Anne Caldwell
‘I took Frank O’Hara to bed last night – I was tired of waiting for you’ by Maria Isakova Bennett
‘How Wolves Change Rivers’ by Kim Moore

First Prize: Liz Venn

Picture Window

It appeared overnight in Whetton’s farm,
in his second largest meadow, where he’d planned
to graze the lambs when better weather came.
He’d found a broken bicycle last June,
crooked as a bad fall, and once a fridge
still cold from the night with a single egg
left in the door like a prayer, but never
a picture window with diamond glass,
propped in grass to separate sky from sky.

They had to come and fetch him in that evening,
the day gone sitting by its panelled frame,
and through the weeks that followed
he was drawn in the way a tongue is drawn
to the hole where a tooth should be.
When they nagged him for it, he could only say
that there’d always been an inside
and an outside to that field, that for the first time
he could look through clear from one to the other.

Comments from judge Vona Groarke
1st Prize: ‘Picture Window’ by Liz Venn

This apparently simple narrative poem really packs a punch. In telling the story of a farmer who comes upon a window in one of his fields, a field moreover where misplaced domestic objects have the habit of turning up out of the blue, it handles its larger resonance with grace and ease. It concerns itself with the place of the extraordinary in the familiar, and in so doing, in allowing the natural world to be surprised by the evidence of human habitation, it reminds us of what an extraordinary object a poem itself can be, nestling inside quotidian and, all too often, debased language. Farmer Whetton finds a window, and through it we find a poem. There’s not a word too many, not a forced or overwrought sentiment. The fact of the window speaks for itself, and the clincher final lines that express the farmer’s puzzlement at a window where no window should be, reminds us of how unsettling and disorienting good poetry can be. The well-made poem asks us to see in several directions at once, over boundaries and gaps of time and place and sensibility, the publicly accessible and the intensely private. The good poem displaces and disrupts and does so with a light touch, so that we find ourselves almost unaccountably amazed, and barely able to say why. ‘Picture Window’ is a sly and delightful Ars Poetica: it has something to say about poetry, and it says it with understatement and delicious, foot-sure poise. It’s exactly the kind of poem you hope to find when you agree to judge a competition; the poem that knows what it’s doing, and does it quietly, ambitiously and very, very well.

Second Prize: Polly Atkin

Causeway

Crossing over you panicked I’d drive us
under. I doubted myself, the clock,

the water. The sun was yellow and long.
I’d got us lost already, looking

for somewhere to stop. Now we wavered,
counting out-loud by a tide-table facing

moonish sands, warning signs,
causeway spotted with seaweed, sea-lochs

in miniature, mirroring epic sky.
You gripped the passenger doorhandle, eyeing

the shifting horizon. I can’t say for certain
we left the island wholer. We put

our feet in the earth, climbed a bank
of long stiff grass. Photographed each other.

For half an hour we breathed in light
then chased inland, though the road was dry,

passing again the white wooden tower
that looked to us like war, but stands

to hold up life. Healing island.
We do not know what it means. They say

nobody knows what it means.

Comments from judge Vona Groarke
2nd Prize: ‘Causeway’ by Polly Atkin

One line in particular clinched it for me: ‘I can’t say for certain / we left the island wholer’. As if we could. The bravura undercut immediately by doubt and hesitation is a striking combination. I found this kind of quizzical and fascinating duality throughout the poem: there is an I and a You, and the poem does not feel obliged to introduce them with any linear biographical fact – they just are. Their relationship, whatever it is, is contested and tricky: the You lacks faith, the I lacks self-belief. They are, you can’t help but suspect, going nowhere together. The Causeway of the title is a ploy: it suggests a way of getting from a momentarily inaccessible place to another more commonly experienced. That strikes me as a decent metaphor for how it is that human relations operate. There are moments where the remote becomes blindingly available, and others where the ordinary becomes fraught with perceived danger and doubt. Our small narratives, and this one in particular, are played out against an ‘epic sky’. We are only small fry, really. Our dramas are of very little account. And yet. I liked the poem because it recognises this inconsequentiality, but makes a poem of it anyhow. That seems to me a daring act, and a necessary one.

Third Prize: Ken Evans

The Workplace

Sun the colour of vended tea
bounces from office glass
buffs itself on the pond, outlines
bark on a line of beech trees
straight as margins on a screen.

On the far side of the trees,
a towpath turns through grass fletched
by bike-tyre tracks. Brown birds
peck in reeds for insects
fooled by unseasonal warmth.

Plastic bottles and packets of crisps
nose-dive in reeds, a lone angler
wastes white maggots. I avoid others
from the office in case we have to
talk about television.

A grey invasion from a lowering sky,
The tower-block folds down lunch-breaks
like furled umbrellas at revolving doors.
The point is, there are long dark afternoons
in midwinter with too few days even as
half-decent as this. No-one here I can know.

Comments from judge Vona Groarke
3rd Prize: ‘The Workplace’ by Ken Evans’

Poems about places of work are a rare breed. It’s almost as if we agree that offices and colleagues are not as fit a subject for poetry as nature and lovers must be. I liked this poem because it doesn’t flinch from the commonplace of most of our lives; nor does it feel the need to extract a numinous resonance from it. It is, as the saying goes, what it is. The poem constructs a topography, and from that, insinuates a mood. It’s subtle, and it never loses sight of its realism, of its facts. This transaction is managed skilfully and adroitly, in lines that conduct themselves with poise, and the kind of concentrated detail that the literal demands, whilst also deploying language that has charge and energy. That ‘fletched’ is very fetching. But the cadence with its downward trajectory feels all too familiar, and the first line strikes the kind of corrective note a bassoon does in a symphony. It’s uncompromising and it’s earthy, but still, a definite sensibility comes into its own. Ground gets covered, and without diluting or squandering its essential and bare-knuckled realism, something significant and sensitive and alert gets said. And that is no mean feat in a poem this short.

Highly Commended Poem

‘Skype’ by Stephen Sexton
Comments by judge Vona Groarke

This is a very agile poem that goes headlong at distinctions of geography, language and circumstance, and blurs them all into what is intimate and immediate, as Skype is wont to do. It’s strange and affecting, and as with all good poems, it doesn’t explain itself away, but instead, retains an element of essential mystery in its narrative and set-up. I like how it proposes a setting, a room, a family, an establishing shot as it were, and then undercuts the lot with a single word, ‘boast’, that doesn’t make a simple kind of sense, and yet seems apposite. It’s a beguiling poem, and its many strangenesses and swerves and fresh starts underscore the whole poem and hold it in good stead.

Five Commended Poems

‘Another Life’ by David Underdown
‘The Name Experiment’ by Olivia Walwyn
‘Clocks’ by Anne Caldwell
‘I took Frank O’Hara to bed last night – I was tired of waiting for you’ by Maria Isakova Bennett
‘How Wolves Change Rivers’ by Kim Moore

Comments by judge Vona Groarke

These five poems have one thing in common: they all took me by surprise. ‘Another Life’ is marvellously compact and precise, and yet evocative, opening out in ways that are impossible to anticipate. ‘The Name Experiment’ takes a big risk with its ‘unfinished’ ending, the kind of risk you can’t help but commend and want to steal. ‘Clocks’ covers a huge swathe of ground, emotional, narrative and imagistic, earthing them all in the single placename of the poem’s last phrase. Who could resist a poem with a title like, ‘I took Frank O’Hara to bed last night – I was tired of waiting for you’? In its cornucopic range and teeming detail, it holds its nerve with admirable style. ‘How Wolves Change Rivers’ is that rare thing, a poem of great beauty and arresting poise. I’m delighted to have encountered it, and intend to keep it near, as I will several of these poems, which I’ve had the honour to read.

Information about the Competition

214 poets (96 men and 118 women) submitted a total of 589 poems.

This was an excellent and encouraging number and the overall standard was very pleasing. We were delighted to welcome Vona Groarke as our judge, and offer our thanks and appreciation for her enthusiasm, professionalism and attention to detail.

Entries were received from all over the UK: from Surrey to the Isle of Arran and all points between, a good number but by no means the majority came from the North of England. Due to the introduction of online entries this year we saw an upsurge in entries from overseas, with poets submitting from Ireland, Sri Lanka, USA, Canada, Australia, South Africa, Paris, Dublin and Greece, making our competition a truly international one.

All entries were clearly addressed and, without exception, appropriate payments included. Thank you to all our entrants for your help in this and for your interest in our Competition.

Thank you to everyone involved in the organisation, promotion and success of the second Poets and Players

Competition.Please look out for future announcements about the 2015 Competition. We look forward to the Poets and Players Competition growing in stature and popularity.

Videos of the winners performing their poems will be available shortly on our Youtube Channel.

Any feedback relating to any aspect of the competition is most welcome.

 

THE 2014 COMPETITION IS NOW CLOSED

We are pleased to announce the 2nd poetry competition run by Poets and Players, one of Manchester’s leading organisers of poetry and music events. Last year’s judge Jacob Polley had this to say about the 1st Poets and Players Competition: ‘This competition was scrupulously organised, and I loved the fact that the anonymity of the entries allowed each poem to speak for itself’.

OUR JUDGE FOR 2014 WILL BE VONA GROARKE

Vona pic

Vona Groarke has published five collections, most recently Spindrift (a PBS Recommendation, Autumn 2009). Her next, X, (also a PBS Recommendation) is due in early 2014 from Gallery Press. Her poems have recently appeared in Yale Review, Kenyon Review, The Guardian, Poetry Review and The New Yorker. She teaches poetry in the Centre for New Writing at the University of Manchester.

POETS AND PLAYERS PRIZE

All poems will be judged anonymously. All entries will be read by Vona Groarke.

1st Prize – £400                2nd Prize – £200              3rd Prize – £100

Closing Date 16 April 2014

Winners will be informed by 31 May 2014 and will be invited to read alongside Vona Groarke at a launch ceremony on the afternoon of 21 June 2014 at the John Rylands Library, Manchester where they will also receive their prize. If you have not been notified by 31 May 2014, we are afraid you have not been successful.

RULES AND OTHER INFORMATION

  • The competition is open to anyone over the age of 16, except for members of the Poets and Players committee.
  • Poems must be in English.
  • Poems can be on any subject, in any style or form, but must be the author’s own original work. They should not have appeared anywhere before, online or in print. Please do not submit poems that are currently under consideration elsewhere.
  • Maximum line length for individual poems is 40 lines (excluding title).
  • No changes can be made to poems once submitted and we regret that we are unable to provide feedback or make any refunds.
  • You may submit as many poems as you wish, accompanied by the appropriate payment and application form.
  • Please note that all competition entries must reach us by Wednesday 16 April 2014, (online entries may be submitted up to 12am on this date; postal entries must be received in our mailbox no later than 16 April 2014). Entries arriving after this date will not be considered.

HOW TO ENTER

ENTER BY POST

ALL entries must be accompanied by a completed application form (see the link below):

Competition Application Form

  • Please post the completed Competition Application form and poems to: Poets and Players Poetry Competition, Poetry Dene, 16 Clifton Street, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5DY.
  • If you wish to receive confirmation of your entry please enclose a prepaid envelope.
  • Poems must be printed on separate, numbered sheets, word processed (or typed) and clearly legible.
  • Please do not include your name or other identifying information on the same page as the poem/s. All poems will be judged anonymously.
  • You may enter as many poems as you wish but please ensure you add all poem titles to the application form.
  • Entry fee is £3 per poem or 4 for £10. Please do not send cash. Postal entries must be paid by cheque or postal order (only email entries may use Paypal). Please make payable to ‘Poets and Players’ and send together with your poem/s and Competition Application form to the address above.

ENTER BY EMAIL

ALL entries must be accompanied by a completed application form (see the link below):

Competition Application Form 

      • Please email the completed Competition Application form and poems to P-Pcomp@mail.comAll email entries will be acknowledged.
      • Please ensure that all poems are sent as an attachment and not in the body of the email. Please use your name as the title of the document (poems and application form can be in the same document but must be on separate pages). If you are submitting more than one poem you may include them all in the same attachment but please ensure pages are numbered and start each poem on a new page. Please save documents as doc, docx or PDF.
      • You may enter as many poems as you wish but please ensure you add all poem titles to the application form.
      • Please do not include your name or other identifying information on the same page as the poem/s. All poems will be judged anonymously.
      • Entry fee is £3 per poem or 4 for £10. Email entries must be paid by Paypal, IMPORTANT please include the Paypal reference number on the application form.
      • Single poem £3   Pay Now Button with Credit Cards
      • Four poems £10   Pay Now Button with Credit Cards

CHECKLIST:  Completed Application Form; poems on separate sheets (with no identifying information); cheque or postal order made payable to ‘Poets and Players’ (if submitting by post); Paypal reference (if submitting by email).

COPYRIGHT

Entrants retain copyright of their poem, however we would hope to receive permission to make a video recording of the winners reading at the awards ceremony for our website, and to publish the winning poems on our website and/or in the John Rylands Library for one year after the competition.

grand_award_lottery_logo_08

Advertisements

8 Responses to Competition 2014

  1. H. Astley says:

    Hi, do the rules allow for the submission of a piece that has previously been self-published (i.e. posted on a blog/personal site) but has since been taken down?

    Like

    • notaragorn says:

      Hi Humphrey. I’m afraid the rules are clear about this: “Poems … should not have appeared anywhere before, online or in print”. I’m really sorry, but unless the blog in question was a completely closed one – eg one that only a supervisor at university had access to – the fact that you’ve taken the poem off the blog doesn’t make it qualify.

      Like

  2. Dianne Cook says:

    Hi, Are international entries accepted?

    Like

  3. ellen meredith says:

    Hi,
    Have had my email entry to the competition sent back as undelivered.
    However my PayPal payment of £10 has been accepted.
    Not impressed by this

    Like

  4. Brandon says:

    Will blank lines between stanzas count toward the 40 line limit?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s